AP Gov Supreme Court Cases: All 14 Required Cases Explained
All 14 required AP Gov Supreme Court cases explained: facts, holdings, constitutional clauses, smart pairings, and a worked SCOTUS comparison FRQ example.
AP US Government and Politics currently has 14 required Supreme Court cases: Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, Schenck v. United States, Brown v. Board of Education, Baker v. Carr, Engel v. Vitale, Gideon v. Wainwright, Tinker v. Des Moines, New York Times Co. v. United States, Wisconsin v. Yoder, Shaw v. Reno, United States v. Lopez, McDonald v. Chicago, and Citizens United v. FEC. For each one, you need to know the facts, the constitutional clause involved, the holding, and the reasoning well enough to compare it with a case you have never seen. Older study guides list 15 cases because they include Roe v. Wade, which College Board removed after the Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
The 14 required AP Gov Supreme Court cases at a glance
This list matches the current AP US Government and Politics Course and Exam Description on AP Central.
| Case | Year | Constitutional issue | Holding in one line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marbury v. Madison | 1803 | Article III, judicial power | Established judicial review: courts can strike down laws that conflict with the Constitution |
| McCulloch v. Maryland | 1819 | Necessary and Proper Clause; Supremacy Clause | Congress has implied powers (it could create a national bank), and states cannot tax federal institutions |
| Schenck v. United States | 1919 | First Amendment, speech | Speech creating a "clear and present danger" (urging draft resistance in wartime) can be punished |
| Brown v. Board of Education | 1954 | Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection | Racially segregated public schools are inherently unequal and unconstitutional |
| Baker v. Carr | 1962 | Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection | Legislative apportionment is a question federal courts can decide, opening the door to "one person, one vote" |
| Engel v. Vitale | 1962 | First Amendment, Establishment Clause | School-sponsored prayer in public schools is unconstitutional, even if voluntary and nondenominational |
| Gideon v. Wainwright | 1963 | Sixth Amendment, via the Fourteenth | States must provide a lawyer to defendants in felony cases who cannot afford one |
| Tinker v. Des Moines | 1969 | First Amendment, symbolic speech | Students' armbands protesting the Vietnam War were protected; schools may restrict speech only if it would substantially disrupt school |
| New York Times Co. v. United States | 1971 | First Amendment, press | The government failed to justify prior restraint to stop publication of the Pentagon Papers |
| Wisconsin v. Yoder | 1972 | First Amendment, Free Exercise | Amish families could not be compelled to send children to school beyond eighth grade |
| Shaw v. Reno | 1993 | Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection | Redistricting based predominantly on race must meet strict scrutiny |
| United States v. Lopez | 1995 | Commerce Clause | The Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce |
| McDonald v. Chicago | 2010 | Second Amendment, via the Fourteenth | The individual right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments |
| Citizens United v. FEC | 2010 | First Amendment, political speech | The government may not limit independent political expenditures by corporations and unions |
The cases grouped by what they teach
Memorizing 14 cases in chronological order is the hardest way to learn them. Group them by the concept they illustrate, because that is how exam questions use them.
Federalism and the powers of Congress
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): Maryland taxed the Second Bank of the United States. The Court held that the Necessary and Proper Clause gives Congress implied powers, and the Supremacy Clause prevents states from taxing a federal institution. This case expands national power.
- United States v. Lopez (1995): A student was charged under the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The Court held that carrying a gun near a school is not economic activity substantially affecting interstate commerce, so Congress exceeded its Commerce Clause power. This case limits national power and favors the states.
These two make a natural pair: one expands federal authority, the other sets a boundary on it.
The judiciary and checks and balances
- Marbury v. Madison (1803): William Marbury sued for his undelivered commission as a justice of the peace. The Court ruled that part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, establishing judicial review, the foundation of the Court's power to check Congress and the president.
First Amendment: religion
- Engel v. Vitale (1962): New York public schools opened the day with a state-composed prayer. The Court held that this violated the Establishment Clause.
- Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972): Amish parents refused to send their children to school past eighth grade. The Court held that compulsory attendance beyond that point violated the Free Exercise Clause.
Use these two to show the difference between the Establishment Clause (government may not sponsor religion) and the Free Exercise Clause (government may not unduly burden religious practice).
First Amendment: speech and press
- Schenck v. United States (1919): Charles Schenck distributed leaflets urging men to resist the World War I draft. The Court upheld his conviction under the Espionage Act, introducing the "clear and present danger" test.
- Tinker v. Des Moines (1969): Students wore black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The Court held that students do not lose their free speech rights at school and that symbolic speech is protected unless it substantially disrupts school.
- New York Times Co. v. United States (1971): The Nixon administration sought to block publication of the classified Pentagon Papers. The Court ruled against prior restraint, holding that the government had not met its heavy burden.
- Citizens United v. FEC (2010): A nonprofit corporation wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton close to the 2008 primaries. The Court held that independent political spending is protected speech and struck down limits on corporate and union independent expenditures.
Civil liberties and selective incorporation
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Clarence Gideon was tried for a felony in Florida without a lawyer. The Court incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
- McDonald v. Chicago (2010): Chicago effectively banned handgun ownership. The Court incorporated the Second Amendment against the states.
These are your two clearest examples of selective incorporation, a term the exam expects you to use correctly.
Civil rights and equal protection
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954): Segregated public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson in public education.
- Baker v. Carr (1962): Tennessee had not redrawn its legislative districts in decades, leaving rural voters overrepresented. The Court held that apportionment challenges are justiciable.
- Shaw v. Reno (1993): North Carolina drew an oddly shaped majority-minority congressional district. The Court held that districts drawn predominantly on the basis of race are subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause.
How are the cases used on the AP Gov exam?
The exam is fully digital in Bluebook. Section I has 55 multiple-choice questions in 80 minutes; Section II has 4 free-response questions in 100 minutes. Each section is worth 50%.
One free-response question, the SCOTUS Comparison, gives you a nonrequired case and asks you to compare it with a required case. You will typically need to identify a constitutional provision the cases share, explain how the facts or reasoning of the required case relate to the new case, and connect the decision to a broader political response or principle.
Worked example: a SCOTUS comparison
Suppose the prompt describes Morse v. Frederick (2007), in which a high school student unfurled a banner reading "BONG HiTS 4 JESUS" at a school-supervised event, and the Court upheld the principal's decision to suspend him.
A strong response compares it with Tinker: "Both cases involve the First Amendment free speech rights of public school students. In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Court protected students' armbands because their political message did not substantially disrupt school. In Morse v. Frederick, the Court reached a different outcome because the banner could reasonably be read as promoting illegal drug use, which schools have an important interest in discouraging."
Notice the structure: shared clause, the required case's facts and holding, then the reason the outcomes differ.
How do you memorize the required cases?
- Learn each case in four lines: facts, constitutional question, holding, significance.
- Pair cases that contrast: McCulloch and Lopez (federal power), Engel and Yoder (religion clauses), Schenck and Tinker (limits on speech).
- Practice with nonrequired cases: Take any recent Supreme Court decision, identify which required case it most resembles, and write a three-sentence comparison.
- Know the clause, not just the amendment: "First Amendment" is too vague; "Establishment Clause" is what earns points.
The argument essay draws instead on required foundational documents. Note that for the 2026-27 school year, College Board added four: the Emancipation Proclamation, Federalist No. 39, the Gettysburg Address, and core principles from Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations.
To estimate your score from practice tests, use the AP US Government score calculator. Cutoffs are not published in advance, so treat the result as an estimate.
How Ivystar can help
Ivystar's AP Exam Prep pairs you with a tutor from schools like Harvard, Penn, Cornell, Stanford, or MIT who drills SCOTUS comparisons and argument essays with you in private 1-on-1 or small-group sessions, backed by our "Get an A or we work for free" guarantee on your class grade. Book a free 20-minute strategy call to build your AP Gov plan.
Frequently asked questions
How many required Supreme Court cases are there in AP Gov?+
There are 14 required cases in the current AP US Government and Politics Course and Exam Description. Older lists show 15 because they include Roe v. Wade, which College Board removed after the 2022 Dobbs decision.
Is Dobbs v. Jackson a required AP Gov case?+
No. Dobbs is not on the required list. College Board removed Roe v. Wade from the list after Dobbs and did not add Dobbs in its place.
What is the SCOTUS comparison question on AP Gov?+
It is one of the four free-response questions. You are given a nonrequired Supreme Court case and asked to compare it with a required case, explaining how the required case's facts or reasoning relate to the new one.
Which AP Gov cases deal with selective incorporation?+
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to counsel) and McDonald v. Chicago (right to keep and bear arms) are the clearest examples. Both applied a Bill of Rights protection to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Get a plan built for your student
Book a free 20-minute strategy call with Ivystar's founder. Get an A — or we work for free.